I like lists. It’s something about their order, the accumulation of what has been or the promise of what is to come.
Once, when I was about fifteen, I spent a number of days compiling a list of books I wanted to read. It runs to several pages of tiny handwriting in a square-papered French exercise book. I uncovered it recently and flicked through, expecting to confidently cross off, or rather put a neat tick (for that was the method I had chosen) next to most of the books.
Not so. I managed one or two, here and there. Recently another –
Postcards from the Edge – but the mass remains unread.
Lists of books are tricky, subjective things. The perennial lists of what is ‘good’ – best books, top books, favourite books – almost seem confined to the same library, a combination of GCSE and A-level set texts (
Wuthering Heights,
Jane Eyre), other books which are perceived to be ‘good’, a smattering of reasonably modern works then, of course,
The Lord of the Rings and, latterly, the septiform
Harry Potter beast. Nothing too experimental or self-consciously difficult, and most of them read before we reach majority: my reasonable acquaintance with the Western Canon is entirely down to my approximation of a modern classical education by some enlightened teachers.
Yet I always count how many of them I have read, expecting a respectable number, but generally managing less than half. For example, of the BBC’s 2003 ‘Top 100 books’, I have managed thirty. Of the 1001 Books to Read Before You Die, less than a hundred. (Though am pleased, if a little surprised, to note the prominence of South African writing on that list).
Of course, I have tried to be scrupulously honest, to tick off only books that I have read all the way through, in its original form. I don’t think my
Black Beauty picture book counts. But if I count, along with the books that I have read, the books I feel I have read, the number looks infinitely better (especially if you also count the books I own). Like Clive James, I never quite got round to reading
Middlemarch, though I did manage an essay of passably scholarliness for a first-year undergraduate, and there are many others. I’ve at least heard of most of them, even if they inhabit some dim literary hinterland where it’s a little too dark to tell if it’s Flann O’Brien or Flannery O’Connor.
But are lists good things anyway? Limited at best, prescriptive at worst, I prefer my free-range habits, my reading ratio of one ‘proper’ book to be savoured and considered to one ‘junk food’ to be gulped down and galloped through. Books lead on to each other, an organic process rather than moving down a list: I read Gillian Slovo’s
Every Secret Thing: My Family, My Country, then immediately ordered
117 Days by Ruth First from amazon, something I had meant to do ages ago, when I read
The Jail Diary of Albie Sachs.
I suspect it’s the lists that I like, not the instructions they contain.